Saturday, May 03, 2014
A multicenter study concludes that treating infants with high doses of steroids fails to improve medical outcomes in the end-stage pediatric liver disease biliary atresia and leads to earlier onset of serious adverse events.
Researchers say the clinical trial involving 14 sites provides new evidence on a growing controversy in the medical community – whether treating infants with steroids to augment surgery improves outcomes. Results for the study are published May 7 in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
“The results from this clinical trial differ from previous reports of a benefit from steroid therapy on bile drainage or survival in biliary atresia,” said Jorge Bezerra, MD, a lead investigator on the study and physician in the division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center.
“Although we cannot exclude some small potential benefit from steroid treatment, we observed no statistical differences in two-year survival between patients receiving steroid treatment after surgery and those receiving placebo,” Bezerra said. “Children receiving steroids during the study also developed serious adverse events more quickly, raising a potential increase in risks associated with steroid therapy.”
Biliary atresia is the leading cause of pediatric liver transplantation in the world. The disease accounts for about 50 percent of transplants in children and 10 percent of transplants at any age. It results from inflammation and rapid accumulation of connective tissues that obstruct and restrict bile ducts from draining. The condition then manifests as cholestatic jaundice in the first few weeks after birth.
At diagnosis, the primary treatment is the hepatoportoenterostomy (HPE, the Kasai procedure) – a surgical procedure that removes the diseased bile ducts and gallbladder and connects an intestinal loop directly to the liver to restore bile drainage. Study authors point out that some clinicians suggest steroid treatment after surgery may help prevent additional fibrosis and improve bile drainage. The current study – called START (Steroids in Biliary Atresia Randomized Trial) – was designed to provide rigorous medical data to help answer that question.
The study involved 140 infants with a median age of 2.3 months. The initial study was conducted between September 2005 and February 2011, with follow-up ending in January 2013.
Researchers report that in 70 children treated with steroids, bile drainage was not significantly different six months post-surgery compared to 70 children who received placebo after surgery. Of the 70 who received steroids, 41 of 70 patients (58.6 percent) had improved bile drainage. Of 70 patients who did not receive steroids, 34 of 70 (48.6 percent) had improved bile drainage.
When researchers compared survival rates between the steroid/non-steroid groups at age 24 months, 58.7 percent of children in the steroid group survived compared to 59.4 percent in the placebo group.
The percent of children who experienced serious safety events was relatively the same between the steroid group (81.4 percent) and non-steroid group (80 percent), but children who received steroids had an earlier time to onset for those events. Serious safety events occurred with 30 days post-surgery in 37.2 percent of children who received steroid treatment, versus 19 percent in the placebo group.
Potential serious safety events the authors pointed to included complications such as immunosuppression, associated risk of infection, poor wound healing, hyperglycemia, gastrointestinal bleeding, poor growth, and inadequate response to routine immunizations.
Funding support for the study came from grants provided by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK grant numbers DK62497, 62503, 62436, 62453, 62445, 62481, 62466, 62500, 62452, 62470, 84538, DK84585, 62470, 84536, 62456). Formula and medications for the study were provided by – in coordination through the NIDDK – by support GlaxoSmithKline, Axcan Pharma US, Inc., and Mead Johnson Nutrition.
Other institutions collaborating on the study included: the NIDDK; the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.; Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh/University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; University of California San Francisco/Benioff Children's Hospital; Children's Hospital Los Angeles and University of Southern California; Children's Hospital of Philadelphia; Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston; Emory University School of Medicine and Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta; Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY; Indiana University School of Medicine and Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, IN; Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center ranks third in the nation among all Honor Roll hospitals in U.S. News and World Report’s 2013 Best Children’s Hospitals ranking. It is ranked #1 for cancer and in the top 10 for nine of 10 pediatric specialties. Cincinnati Children’s, a non-profit organization, is one of the top three recipients of pediatric research grants from the National Institutes of Health, and a research and teaching affiliate of the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine. The medical center is internationally recognized for improving child health and transforming delivery of care through fully integrated, globally recognized research, education and innovation. Additional information can be found at www.cincinnatichildrens.org. Connect on the Cincinnati Children’s blog, via Facebook and on Twitter.