Findings / References
Ultimately, patient- and family-centered rounds challenge us to move beyond our comfort zone and approach uncertainty at the bedside. Patients like bedside rounds but want doctors to use understandable language and allow them to participate. Learners don’t like bedside presentations, but they become comfortable with experience and practice.
The information in this literature review on family-centered rounds referenced data from the following sources:
Brinkman WB, Simmons J, Vossmeyer M, Muething S. Family-Centered Rounds: Overcoming Barriers To Get Back to the Bedside. Educational Workshop at Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting. San Francisco, CA, May, 2006.
Using Patient-Centered Care Principles to Improve Discharge Timeliness. Pediatric Academic Societies’ Meeting Platform Presentation, San Francisco, CA., May 1-4, 2004. Pediatric Research 55:4; 2004.
Anderson RJ, Cyran E, Schilling L, Lin C-T, Albertson G, Ware L, Steiner JF. Outpatient case presentations in the conference room versus examination room: Results from two randomized controlled trials. Am J Med. 2002; 113:657-662.
Nair BR, Coughlan JL, Hensley MJ. Student and patient perspectives on bedside teaching. Medical Education 1997; 31:341-346.
Lehmann LS, Brancati GL, Chen MC, Roter D, Dobs AS. The effect of bedside case presentation on patients’ perceptions of their medical care. N Engl J Med. 1997; 336:1150-1155.
Miller M, Johnson B, Greene HL, Baier M, Nowlin S. An observational study of attending rounds. J Gen Intern Med. 1992; 7:646-648.
Kroenke K, Simmons JO, Copley JB, Smith C. Attending rounds: a survey of physician attitudes. J Gen Intern Med. 1990; 5: 229-233.
Wang-Cheng RM, Barnas GP, Sigmann P, Riendl PA, Young JM. Bedside case presentation: why patients like them but learners don’t. J Gen Intern Med. 1989; 321:1273-1275.
Linfors EW, Neelon FA. The case for bedside rounds. N Engl J Med. 1980; 21:1230-1233.